Agenda and minutes

Councillor	Minute Number	Nature of Interest
Cllr Cal Corkery	141	Personal, Cllr Corkery was a council tenant.
Cllr Graham Heaney	144	Personal, Cllr Heaney was a member of the RSPB.
Cllr Mark Jeffery	148	Personal, Cllr Jeffery was employed by Portsmouth Water.

 

It was

 

Proposed by Councillor Steve Pitt

Seconded by Councillor Simon Bosher

 

That the minutes of the Council meeting held on 14 November 2023 be confirmed as a correct record.

 

These were agreed by assent.

 

 

 

Apologies for absence had been received from Councillor Charlotte Gerada and Councillor Benedict Swann

 

Apologies for lateness had been received from Councillor Kimberly Barret.

The Lord Mayor announced that in consultation with the Leader, he had cancelled the provisional 16 January 2023 Full Council meeting.

Deputations by members of the public may be made on any item where a decision is going to be taken. The request should be made in writing to the contact officer (james.harris@portsmouthcc.gov.uk) by 12 noon of the working day before the meeting (so Monday 11 December 2023  for this meeting), and must include the purpose of the deputation (for example, for or against the recommendations). Email requests are accepted.

The City Solicitor advised that two verbal deputation requests had been made for this meeting. 

 

The first was from Maria Cole in support of minute 141, Housing Revenue Account Residential Stock Portfolio Acquisition.

 

The second was from Christine Elemer in support of minute 146, Notice of Motion - Ceasefire in Gaza.

 

At the invitation of the City Solicitor, Maria Cole and Christine Elemer delivered their deputations to Council.

The Lord Mayor advised that no public questions had been received under the provisions of this Standing Order.

 

RESOLVED that the following appointment be AGREED:

 

Councillor Graham Heaney to replace Councillor Asghar Shah as the Labour Group Standing Deputy on the Employment Committee.

 

RESOLVED that the following appointment be NOTED:

 

Councillor George Madgwick as the Portsmouth Independent Party Group Opposition Spokesperson for the Environmental Services Portfolio.

The Lord Mayor advised that he had not been made aware of any urgent business for this meeting.

To receive and consider the attached report and noting recommendation from Cabinet held on 28 November 2023.  The report has also been considered by the Governance & Audit and Standards Committee.

Council Agenda Item 9 (Cabinet Minute 100) Treasury Management Mid-Year Review 2023/24

 

The recommendations contained in minute 100 of the Cabinet meeting held on 28 November 2023 were approved unopposed.

 

RESOLVED:

 

 i.    That the Council's Treasury Management activities have remained within the Treasury Management Policy 2023/24 in the period up to 30 September 2023; and

 

ii.    That the actual Treasury Management indicators as at 30 September 2023 set out in Appendix A be NOTED.

“That, under the provisions of Section 100A of the Local Government Act, 1972 as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) Act, 1985, the press and public be excluded for the consideration of the following item on the grounds that the report(s) contain information defined as exempt in Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act, 1972”.

 

The public interest in maintaining the exemption must outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information.

 

Under the Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) England Regulations 2012, regulation 5, the reasons for exemption of the listed item is shown below.

 

Members of the public may make representation as to why the item should be held in open session.  A statement of the Council’s response to representations received will be given at the meeting so that this can be taken into account when members decide whether or not to deal with the item under exempt business.

 

(NB     The exempt/ confidential committee papers on the agenda will contain information which is commercially, legally or personally sensitive and should not be divulged to third parties.  Members are reminded of standing order restrictions on the disclosure of exempt information and are invited to return their exempt documentation to the Senior Local Democracy Officer at the conclusion of the meeting for shredding).

 

Item 11 Housing Revenue Account Residential Stock Portfolio Acquisition   Appendices 1, 4 & 7

Paragraph  3

 

 

 

The Lord Mayor advised that proceedings would be kept open until such time that members wished to discuss the exempt appendices to the following report:

 

·       Housing Revenue Account Residential Stock Portfolio Acquisition

 

At the conclusion of the consideration of the non-exempt report and appendices, the resolution to move into exempt session to consider the exempt appendices was not passed, as members did not have any questions specific to them.

To receive and consider the attached report and recommendation from Cabinet held on 28 November 2023.

 

Please note that Appendices 1, 4 and 7 (circulated within the separate exempt annex to this agenda) contain exempt information as specified under Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended):

'Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).'

Council Agenda item 11 (Cabinet Minute 98)

 

Housing Revenue Account Residential Stock Portfolio Acquisition

 

The recommendations contained in minute 98 of the Cabinet meeting held on 28 November 2023 were approved unopposed.

 

RESOLVED that Full Council:

 

(i)       Subject to the approval of the recommendations below, delegated authority to the Director for Housing, Neighbourhood and Building Services; Director of Finance & Resources and Section 151 Officer, taking advice from the Council's externally appointed legal advisors, and in consultation with the Leader of the City Council and Cabinet Member for Housing and Tackling Homelessness, to acquire Lot 1a;

 

(ii)       APPROVED that the 'Residential Stock Portfolio Acquisition' scheme be added to the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) section of the Council's Capital Programme with a budget set out in Appendix One to cover the purchase of the housing portfolio, associated fees and planned refurbishment works, and financed by borrowing, subject to the satisfactory completion of:

 

                                               i.        The outstanding due diligence; and

 

                                             ii.        A financial appraisal, approved by the Director of Finance & Resources and S.151 Officer that demonstrates (based on the completed due diligence) that the financial impact and risks are affordable and manageable by the Council; and

 

(iii)    APPROVED the following amendments to the Treasury Management Limits, to facilitate the additional capital expenditure for this acquisition:

 

                                               i.        To increase the authorised limit for external borrowing to £1,176m; and

 

                                             ii.        To increase the operational boundary to £1,143m; and

 

(iv)    That in order that advance treasury management preparations can be made for the transaction should the acquisition proceed:

 

                                               i.        The sector limit for investments in money market funds be temporarily increased to £105m.

 

(v)     NOTED that in approving the temporary changes to the treasury management limits, no obligation to acquire the housing portfolio Lot 1a had been entered into and no long-term financial liabilities had been incurred. The changes simply enabled the Council to accumulate the necessary funding in a risk managed and cost-efficient manner and have funds available should the transaction be completed; the risks are considered negligible; and

 

(vi)  NOTED that the acquisition was subject to Clarion completing a successful formal stock transfer consultation of Clarion residents and Clarion Housing Group Board approval.

To receive and consider the attached report and recommendation from Cabinet held on 28 November 2023.

Council Agenda item 12 (Cabinet Minute 94)

 

Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan: Partial Update – Proposed Submission Plan.

 

The recommendations contained in minute 94 of the Cabinet meeting held on 28 November 2023 were approved unopposed.

 

RESOLVED that Full Council

 

(i)             APPROVED the Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan: Partial Update – Proposed Submission Plan as set out in the report and will be subject to public consultation; and

 

(ii)           delegated authority to the Director of Hampshire 2050 to agree minor amendments to the Proposed Submission Plan prior to consultation.

To receive and consider the attached report and noting recommendation from Cabinet held on 28 November 2023.

 

This item arose from a Notice of Motion agreed by Council on 18 July 2023.

Council Agenda item 13 (Cabinet Minute 96)

 

Unauthorised Encampments

 

Councillor Ryan Brent objected under Standing Order 28 in order to allow the minute to be debated.

 

It was

 

Proposed by Councillor Steve Pitt

Seconded by Councillor Darren Sanders

 

That the recommendations in Cabinet minute 96 be approved

 

Following a vote, the recommendation contained in minute 96 of the Cabinet meeting held on 28 November 2023 was approved.

 

RESOLVED that Full Council NOTED the update report.

To receive and consider the attached report and noting recommendation from the special meeting of the Cabinet held on 4 December 2023.

Council Agenda item 14 (Cabinet Minute 106)

 

Tipner West & Horsea Island East Regeneration

 

The recommendation contained in minute 106 of the Cabinet meeting held on 4 December 2023 were approved unopposed.

 

RESOLVED that Full Council NOTED the content of the report and the decisions taken by Cabinet.

Proposed by Councillor Gerald Vernon-Jackson

Seconded by Councillor Abdul Kadir

 

As a City Council we support a lasting peace and a two-state solution in Israel and Palestine. In the face of the horrific violence of recent weeks, we are clear that a lasting peace is the only way to guarantee the dignity and security which both Palestinians and Israelis deserve. 

Hamas’ terrorist attacks on October 7th shocked the world. We condemn them and the taking of hostages, unequivocally. Hamas cannot, for the security of Israelis nor the future of Palestinians, be allowed to continue in charge of Gaza. 

Right now we have a disaster. Charities and NGOs working on the ground in Gaza have reported how devastating a humanitarian catastrophe we are facing. Thousands of innocent civilians have already been killed, including thousands of children. The humanitarian crisis just seems to get worse. Essential supplies like water, food, medicine and fuel still remain in very short supply or totally cut off from Gaza. And many people are still held hostage, including children. The risk of regional escalation remains a significant threat.

Over two months since Hamas’ atrocities, it is increasingly clear that a military solution to eliminate Hamas is not possible. Nor is it tenable for Israel to reoccupy Gaza. 

Only a sustained political and diplomatic solution will resolve this conflict and deliver a lasting peace. We urgently need movement towards that solution now. The answer is via an immediate bilateral ceasefire.  Whilst the recent truce is to be welcomed, a temporary freezing of the conflict is not acceptable. It leaves Hamas in place in Gaza.

Freezing the conflict doesn’t look to the future and will do nothing to bring about that long term security nor guarantee the return of the remaining hostages.

A ceasefire cannot be an end in itself, even though it is very clearly needed now to stop the bloodshed and trauma for Palestinians and Israelis. It is temporary by its very definition; it is a step towards peace. It is contingent upon both parties sticking to it. If one party breaks the ceasefire, a military option remains on the table. 

We are not naive about the difficulties involved in getting to this position.  It may require a cessation in hostilities, as has already been called for, to create the basis for a ceasefire.  We welcome any progress, however small, towards this goal. Nor will it be easy to rid Gaza of Hamas.

Maximum pressure now needs to be applied on all parties, with tough conditions carefully monitored and verified. That will require a huge and sustained effort from the international community and the UN, with a particular role to be played by Arab neighbours.

 

This City Council calls for an end to this conflict, and to the killing of thousands of innocent civilians, while ensuring that we do not return to how things were before October 7th.  Movement towards a political solution, putting us back on the path to two states, is needed more than ever.

 

This Council also sends its warmest wishes to our sister city of Haifa in Israel and acknowledges the tragic personal losses suffered by her residents. The Council also notes that Haifa is in many ways a beacon of hope for a future of peaceful Jewish and Arab co-existence and we hope its residents are spared any further suffering as a result of the current conflict.

It was

 

Proposed by Councillor Gerald Vernon-Jackson

Seconded by Councillor Abdul Kadir

 

That notice of motion (a) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

 

As an amendment it was

 

Proposed by Councillor Cal Corkery

Seconded by Councillor Kirsty Mellor

 

To add the below three paragraphs to the end of the motion:

 

"Full Council expresses its solidarity with the people of Gaza who in recent weeks and months have been subjected to horrific bombardment resulting in widespread death and destruction. As a practical way of displaying that solidarity Full Council asks the Cabinet and the Twinning Advisory Group to explore, and report back on, Twinning Portsmouth with a Palestinian city.

 

Full Council believes that a permanent ceasefire is the only way to move towards a lasting peace in the region.

 

Full Council therefore asks the Leader of the Council to write to the Foreign Secretary and our two city MPs outlining this position and requesting their support in lobbying for this necessary resolution to the conflict."

 

As an amendment it was

 

Proposed by Councillor Graham Heaney

Seconded by Councillor George Fielding

 

To add after the sentence ending "with a particular role to be played by Arab neighbours" insert the following:

 

"Breaches to international law

 

Allegations of breaches of international humanitarian law should always be treated with utmost seriousness.  Assessing specific allegations is the proper task of lawyers and competent international courts.

 

Council reaffirms its support for the UK's commitment to the rules-based international order, international humanitarian law and the jurisdiction of the ICC to address the conduct of all parties in Gaza and Hama's attacks on Israel.

 

Wider violence in the West Bank

 

We totally condemn acts of violence and extremism by Israeli settlers in the West Bank and call on the Israeli authorities to prevent settler violence, ensure accountability for perpetrators and condemn extremist rhetoric.

 

Council calls on the UK Government to do all it can to work with the international community to avoid further escalation in the West Bank and the wider region.

 

Towards a two-state nation

 

We want a return to the truce we saw last week to protect civilians, prevent displacement, ensure humanitarian access and release hostages.  The international community can and must use the next cessation to make political progress towards what we all want an end to the conflict and a permanent ceasefire.  That means creating the conditions where Israel is secure from another attack like October 7 and Palestinians can see a path to statehood and the reconstruction and renewal of Gaza.

 

Therefore the Council calls for the immediate release of all hostages and for the Government to do all it can to ensure an enduring cessation of fighting as soon as possible and a credible, diplomatic and political process to deliver the lasting peace of a two-state nation."

 

Following debate, the proposer of the original motion, Councillor Gerald Vernon-Jackson, agreed to subsume the amendment put by Councillor Cal Corkery into the motion.  He did not however wish to subsume the amendment put by Councillor Graham Heaney into the motion.

 

Following a vote, the amendment in the name of Councillor Graham Heaney was declared LOST.

 

Council voted on the original motion, with the subsumed amendment in the name of Cllr Cal Corkery.

 

Following the vote, the motion was declared carried.

 

RESOLVED that:

 

As a City Council we support a lasting peace and a two-state solution in Israel and Palestine. In the face of the horrific violence of recent weeks, we are clear that a lasting peace is the only way to guarantee the dignity and security which both Palestinians and Israelis deserve. 

Hamas’ terrorist attacks on October 7th shocked the world. We condemn them and the taking of hostages, unequivocally. Hamas cannot, for the security of Israelis nor the future of Palestinians, be allowed to continue in charge of Gaza. 

 

Right now we have a disaster. Charities and NGOs working on the ground in Gaza have reported how devastating a humanitarian catastrophe we are facing. Thousands of innocent civilians have already been killed, including thousands of children. The humanitarian crisis just seems to get worse. Essential supplies like water, food, medicine and fuel still remain in very short supply or totally cut off from Gaza. And many people are still held hostage, including children. The risk of regional escalation remains a significant threat.

 

Over two months since Hamas’ atrocities, it is increasingly clear that a military solution to eliminate Hamas is not possible. Nor is it tenable for Israel to reoccupy Gaza. 

 

Only a sustained political and diplomatic solution will resolve this conflict and deliver a lasting peace. We urgently need movement towards that solution now. The answer is via an immediate bilateral ceasefire.  Whilst the recent truce is to be welcomed, a temporary freezing of the conflict is not acceptable. It leaves Hamas in place in Gaza.

 

Freezing the conflict doesn’t look to the future and will do nothing to bring about that long term security nor guarantee the return of the remaining hostages.

 

A ceasefire cannot be an end in itself, even though it is very clearly needed now to stop the bloodshed and trauma for Palestinians and Israelis. It is temporary by its very definition; it is a step towards peace. It is contingent upon both parties sticking to it. If one party breaks the ceasefire, a military option remains on the table. 

 

We are not naive about the difficulties involved in getting to this position.  It may require a cessation in hostilities, as has already been called for, to create the basis for a ceasefire.  We welcome any progress, however small, towards this goal. Nor will it be easy to rid Gaza of Hamas.

 

Maximum pressure now needs to be applied on all parties, with tough conditions carefully monitored and verified. That will require a huge and sustained effort from the international community and the UN, with a particular role to be played by Arab neighbours.

 

This City Council calls for an end to this conflict, and to the killing of thousands of innocent civilians, while ensuring that we do not return to how things were before October 7th.  Movement towards a political solution, putting us back on the path to two states, is needed more than ever.

 

This Council also sends its warmest wishes to our sister city of Haifa in Israel and acknowledges the tragic personal losses suffered by her residents. The Council also notes that Haifa is in many ways a beacon of hope for a future of peaceful Jewish and Arab co-existence and we hope its residents are spared any further suffering as a result of the current conflict.

 

Full Council expresses its solidarity with the people of Gaza who in recent weeks and months have been subjected to horrific bombardment resulting in widespread death and destruction. As a practical way of displaying that solidarity Full Council asks the Cabinet and the Twinning Advisory Group to explore, and report back on, Twinning Portsmouth with a Palestinian city.

 

Full Council believes that a permanent ceasefire is the only way to move towards a lasting peace in the region.

 

Full Council therefore asks the Leader of the Council to write to the Foreign Secretary and our two city MPs outlining this position and requesting their support in lobbying for this necessary resolution to the conflict.

Proposed by Councillor Matthew Atkins

Seconded by Councillor Ryan Brent

 

This council calls on the Administration to prepare a budget for the next financial year that makes a serious effort to avoid raising council tax.

 

To this end we call on the Cabinet to publish and consider at least one serious budget proposal before the Full Council Meeting at which the budget is considered that either avoids a raise in Council Tax entirely or raises council tax by at least a full percentage point less than the maximum allowed without a referendum.

It was

 

Proposed by Councillor Matthew Atkins

Seconded by Councillor Ryan Brent

 

That notice of motion (b) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

 

In accordance with Standing Order 48(b), eight Councillors stood to request that a recorded vote be taken.

 

The following members voted in favour of the motion:

 

Councillor Matthew Atkins Councillor Hannah Brent Councillor Raymond Dent Councillor Russell Simpson Councillor John Smith	Councillor Simon Bosher Councillor Ryan Brent Councillor Lewis Gosling Councillor Emily Strudwick Councillor Daniel Wemyss

The following members voted against the motion:

 

Councillor Dave Ashmore Councillor Kimberly Barrett Councillor Peter Candlish Councillor Jason Fazackarley Councillor Graham Heaney Councillor Suzy Horton Councillor Mark Jeffery Councillor Leo Madden Councillor Kirsty Mellor Councillor Steve Pitt Councillor Asghar Shah Councillor Mary Vallely Councillor Matthew Winnington

Councillor Chris Attwell Councillor Stuart Brown Councillor Cal Corkery Councillor George Fielding Councillor Ian Holder Councillor Lee Hunt Councillor Abdul Kadir Councillor Hugh Mason Councillor Leonie Oliver Councillor Darren Sanders Councillor Judith Smyth Councillor Gerald Vernon-Jackson

 

 

The following members abstained from voting:

 

Councillor Yinka Adeniran Councillor Chris Dike Councillor George Madgwick

Councillor Tom Coles Councillor Brian Madgwick

 

RESOLVED that the motion was declared LOST.

Proposed by Councillor Leo Madden

Seconded by Councillor Jason Fazackarley

 

Council notes that Southern Water has advanced plans to increase domestic water bills by at least 55% in order to fund its environmental cleanup programme and shareholder payouts.

 

Customers in the area covered by Southern Water should not be penalised because of Southern Water's long-term mismanagement and incompetence.

 

Council asserts that Southern Water should be properly investing in its network to eliminate sewage discharges rather than expecting customers to bear the responsibility of shareholders.

 

Southern Water has a long history of "misreporting' its performance and being fined not only by Ofwat but by courts for polluting our waters.

 

Council calls on all group leaders to sign a joint letter to the Secretary of State for the Environment and to the Chief Executive of Southern Water demanding a freeze on the proposed increase in customers' bills and asks our local MPs to do likewise. 

It was

 

Proposed by Councillor Leo Madden

Seconded by Councillor Jason Fazackarley

 

That notice of motion (c) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

 

As an amendment it was

 

Proposed by Councillor Graham Heaney

Seconded by Councillor Mary Vallely

 

To add a new paragraph four:

 

“Council notes that Ofwat have stated that ‘Customer bills must be fair. Customers will only pay for future investment, not past company mistakes’. (1)  We call on Ofwat to ensure that there is rigorous scrutiny of water company plans to ensure this happens during the period of consultation. We also call on the government to give the water regulator Ofwat the power to ban bonuses for water company bosses until they have stopped regular discharge of untreated wastewater into rivers and the sea."

In paragraph five (now paragraph six) after “… Southern Water” add “…and the Chief Executive of Ofwat…

 

(1) Water companies must deliver a step change in performance and investment - Ofwat"

 

 

Following debate, the proposer of the original motion, Councillor Leo Madden agreed to subsume the amendment put by Councillor Graham Heaney into the motion.

 

Council voted on the motion incorporating the subsumed amendment in the name of Councillor Graham Heaney.

 

Following the vote, the motion was declared carried.

 

RESOLVED that:

 

Council notes that Southern Water has advanced plans to increase domestic water bills by at least 55% in order to fund its environmental cleanup programme and shareholder payouts.

 

Customers in the area covered by Southern Water should not be penalised because of Southern Water's long-term mismanagement and incompetence.

 

Council asserts that Southern Water should be properly investing in its network to eliminate sewage discharges rather than expecting customers to bear the responsibility of shareholders.

 

Council notes that Ofwat have stated that ‘Customer bills must be fair. Customers will only pay for future investment, not past company mistakes’. (1)  We call on Ofwat to ensure that there is rigorous scrutiny of water company plans to ensure this happens during the period of consultation. We also call on the government to give the water regulator Ofwat the power to ban bonuses for water company bosses until they have stopped regular discharge of untreated wastewater into rivers and the sea."

 

Southern Water has a long history of "misreporting' its performance and being fined not only by Ofwat but by courts for polluting our waters.

 

Council calls on all group leaders to sign a joint letter to the Secretary of State for the Environment, the Chief Executive of Southern Water and the Chief Executive of Ofwat demanding a freeze on the proposed increase in customers' bills and asks our local MPs to do likewise.

 

(1) Water companies must deliver a step change in performance and investment - Ofwat

Proposed by Councillor Graham Heaney

Seconded by Councillor George Fielding

 

The most recent data published by DEFRA on local authority recycling rates (2021/22) show that Portsmouth is 325^th out of 343 local authorities rated for the percentage of household waste that is recycled. The figures show Portsmouth recycles 27.1% of its household waste.

 

We welcome the introduction and extension of food waste collection but despite this it is estimated that the recycling rate for 2022/23 will be 27.9%.

Council notes that in future household waste recycling plans will need to take account of recent government announcements about how increases in recycling can be achieved.

 

Residents support the recycling of waste but the level of improvement in the recycling rate in Portsmouth has been limited so far.

 

Therefore, Council requests that the Cabinet Member for Environmental Services develop a plan, including specific measures, and an estimated timescale, to increase the rate of recycling of household waste collected in Portsmouth.

It was

 

Proposed by Councillor Graham Heaney

Seconded by Councillor George Fielding

 

That notice of motion (d) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

 

As an amendment it was

 

Proposed by Councillor Dave Ashmore

Seconded by Councillor Steve Pitt

 

To delete paragraph four and replace with:

 

"Therefore, Council acknowledges that the Cabinet Member for Environmental Services is already developing a plan that will including specific measures, and an estimated timescale, to increase the rate of recycling of household waste collected in Portsmouth. However, the Council also acknowledges that some of the timescales and plans already considered and developed by the cabinet member may need to be modified once the Government has set clear outlines for its 'Simpler Recycling' plan for local authorities. Any consideration this Council or any other local council in Hampshire makes will also need to be discussed at the Project Integra board where we work in partnership with other local authorities across Hampshire to all manage our waste, increase recycling and invest in large scale financial waste projects together."

 

Following debate, the proposer of the original motion, Councillor Graham Heaney agreed to subsume the amendment put by Councillor Dave Ashmore into the motion. 

 

Council voted on the original motion with the subsumed amendment in the name of Councillor Dave Ashmore.

 

Following the vote, the motion was declared carried.

 

RESOLVED that:

 

The most recent data published by DEFRA on local authority recycling rates (2021/22) show that Portsmouth is 325^th out of 343 local authorities rated for the percentage of household waste that is recycled. The figures show Portsmouth recycles 27.1% of its household waste.

 

We welcome the introduction and extension of food waste collection but despite this it is estimated that the recycling rate for 2022/23 will be 27.9%.

 

Council notes that in future household waste recycling plans will need to take account of recent government announcements about how increases in recycling can be achieved.

 

Residents support the recycling of waste but the level of improvement in the recycling rate in Portsmouth has been limited so far.

 

Therefore, Council acknowledges that the Cabinet Member for Environmental Services is already developing a plan that will including specific measures, and an estimated timescale, to increase the rate of recycling of household waste collected in Portsmouth. However, the Council also acknowledges that some of the timescales and plans already considered and developed by the cabinet member may need to be modified once the Government has set clear outlines for its 'Simpler Recycling' plan for local authorities. Any consideration this Council or any other local council in Hampshire makes will also need to be discussed at the Project Integra board where we work in partnership with other local authorities across Hampshire to all manage our waste, increase recycling and invest in large scale financial waste projects together.

Six questions from members had been received under Standing Order No 17.

 

The first question was from Councillor Daniel Wemyss.

 

"Can the Cabinet Member explain the communication plans in place when a large event is cancelled at short notice such as the case with the recent firework display in Hilsea?"

 

This and supplementary questions were answered by the Cabinet Member for Resources, Councillor Lee Hunt.

 

 

The second question was from Councillor John Smith.

 

"Can the Leader of the Council update members and the hundreds of residents who signed a petition against demolition of the former Record Office, in Museum Road, of the council's plans for the building?"

 

This and supplementary questions were answered by the Leader of the Council, Councillor Steve Pitt.

 

 

The third question was from Councillor Matthew Atkins.

 

" Residents have reported a significant amount of broken glass and rubbish in the landscaping and soil heaps left after the works at KGV. What further clean up and beautification is planned for KGV to rectify the damage done and waste spread across the site by the works and to improve the amenity of the site for local residents?"

 

This and supplementary questions were answered by the Cabinet Member for Culture, Leisure & Economic Development, Councillor Steve Pitt.

 

 

The fourth question was from Councillor Graham Heaney

 

"The review of the council constitution has suffered from some understandable delays but work on this appears to have stalled as no meetings have been scheduled or updates been provided for over six months. Can the leader of the council give an assurance that the review will not be further delayed?"

 

This and supplementary questions were answered by the Leader of the Council, Councillor Steve Pitt.

 

 

The fifth question was from Councillor Daniel Wemyss.

 

" Can the Leader of the Council shed light on the decision-making process behind the restriction of written deputations for Councillors at the Planning Committee? Additionally, could the Leader elaborate on the rationale behind not allowing written deputations and how this approach aligns with the Council's commitment to transparency and effective representation?"

 

This and supplementary questions were answered by the Leader of the Council, Councillor Steve Pitt.

 

 

The sixth question was from Councillor Daniel Wemyss.

 

"Can the Cabinet Member update me on the works promised in the sea defences to commemorate those who lost their lives on the Theofano?"

 

This question was answered by the Cabinet Member for Planning Policy & City Development Councillor Hugh Mason.