Venue: Ground Floor Meeting Room 5 - Civic Offices. View directions
Contact: Lisa Gallacher 02392 834056 Email: email@example.com
Apologies for Absence
Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Lynne Stagg and Ben Dowling. Apologies were also received from education representative Mark Mitchell.
Declarations of Members' Interests
There were no declarations of interest.
RECOMMENDED that the minutes of the Education, Children and Young
People Scrutiny Panel held on 14 July 2014 be agreed as a correct record of the meeting.
RESOLVED that the minutes of the Education, Children & Young People Scrutiny Panel held on 14July 2014 be confirmed as a correct record.
The Chair advised that under Standing Order 57 he wished to add an item of urgent business to the agenda following the publication of the Ofsted inspector's report into children's services. The report included a number of recommendations for improvement and the reason for urgency was to act promptly to these.
The Inspector had also raised
concerns that the panel had not identified any topics related to
children's social care in this year's work programme. Councillor Purvis advised he had been in
discussion with Julian Wooster, Director of Children's Services,
about possible areas the panel could review, following the review
into pupil premium. The panel could then put forward a further
topic to the SMP to be agreed at their next meeting.
The Chair referred to point 16 of the Ofsted report that highlighted the need for elected members to be properly trained in governance and corporate parenting as a point for immediate action. He asked Mr Wooster to look into what local training for members would be appropriate to attend in addition to the training sessions offered by the LGA. ACTION - Mr Wooster to advise the panel on further training courses that would be useful for them to attend to allow them to properly scrutinise and challenge the work of children's social care.
The Ofsted Inspector had also suggested that regular updates by senior officers be brought to the ECYP panel (as well as the Cabinet member) on identified issues to keep panel members up to date with the current issues faced by the service and to ensure oversight and scrutiny. The Chair asked whether it would be possible for Mr Wooster to provide the panel with an update report once a quarter for discussion at panel meetings. Mr Wooster said the panel were right to request a quarterly report to ask the appropriate questions of senior managers. He advised he would have a conversation with the Cabinet member about the best way of providing this information to the panel. There were various other bodies that receive this information; the Children's Trust Board, Safeguarding Board, Corporate Parenting Board, Adoption Panel and Fostering Panel so it was important to avoid duplication. ACTION - Mr Wooster to provide a paper to the next meeting in October on the proposed way forward.
Councillor Godier asked about the support for care leavers which was another area for improvement identified by Ofsted. Mr Wooster explained that the New Belongings Project was in place to address this issue.
(1) That the Youth Offending Team Improvement Plan be put forward to ... view the full minutes text for item 27.
The draft scoping document for 'A Review into Pupil Premium in Portsmouth City Schools' is attached for discussion.
Kelly Nash, Corporate Performance Manager and Richard Webb, Finance Manager will be attending to provide the panel with an overview to pupil premium.
Thepanel had received the draft scoping document and briefing paper on pupil premium.
Richard Webb and Kelly Nash introduced their paper. Richard Webb advised that Pupil Premium funding for maintained schools is allocated via the Council using data provided by the Department for Education. Pupil Premium for Academies is allocated via the Education Funding Agency, except that relating to Looked After Children. Schools and Academies are accountable for how they spend this funding. For Looked After Children (LAC) the virtual school Head, Helen Thompson, determines through personal education plans (PEP) the value of funding that should be allocated to schools.
In response to a question regarding whether free school meals is still used as an indicator for pupil premium, Richard Webb advised that it was. He advised the panel of a paper that went to the last Schools Forum meeting on universal infant free school meals implementation. This advised that the introduction of UIFSM presents a risk to schools in terms of a reduction in the level of pupil premium a school might receive as parents / guardians of children in Year R, 1 and 2 will no longer have any incentive to register for free school meals. To combat this risk the Council issued a letter to all primary and infant schools to help assess the likely uptake of free school meals, but most importantly allow the Council to check for FSM eligibility and therefore claim for pupil premium funding.
In response to a question, Kelly Nash explained that Ofsted have a national interest in the effect pupil premium is having. Ofsted review how a local authority is influencing the spend of pupil premium money. The Council's education officers look at data gaps and raise concern if they need to. They are able to advise schools on areas to consider spending their pupil premium funding but cannot direct them.
Richard Webb informed the panel that in June this year he led a training session for schools with Tony Quinn, the former senior governor support officer. The training session was focused around 'school funding and assessing the impact' and included a session on the use of Pupil Premium and the governors role in ensuring it is being used effectively. This had been well attended with 12-15 governors. Financial Services have developed a training & development programme for schools. Within this programme is an all-day session related to school funding and Pupil Premium which will be taking place on 2nd October. Kelly Nash added that an engaged governing body was very important.
The recent Ofsted report identified that numbers of pupils eligible for free school meals who achieved five good GCSE passes was below the national average. In response to a question Mr Webb said that a more cohesive strategy in respect supporting schools to use Pupil Premium more effectively would be helpful. Finance officers had identified a need to for training to support schools with evaluating the effect of the use of their pupil premium funding, particularly with the ... view the full minutes text for item 28.